Falk, Cornell & Associates, LLP

An Estate Planning Law Firm

Call Us Today (650) 463-1550
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • About The American Academy
    • Advantages of Working With Our Firm
    • Attorney and Staff Profiles
    • News & Events
    • Speaker Connection
  • Services
    • Asset Protection & Business Planning
    • Estate and Gift Tax Figures
    • Estate Planning Services
    • Family-Owned Business
    • Incapacity Planning
    • IRA & Retirement Planning
    • Legacy Planning
    • LGBTQ Estate Planning
    • Pet Planning
    • Senior Resource Guide
    • SECURE Act
    • Special Needs Planning
    • Trust Administration & Probate
  • Seminars
  • Resources
    • Client Resources
    • Consumer Resources
    • ELDER LAW REPORTS
    • Estate Planning & Related Forms
    • Newsletters
    • Professional Resources
    • Published Books
    • Reports
      • Advanced Estate Planning
      • Basic Estate Planning
      • Estate Planning for Niches
      • Trust Administration
  • Contact Us
  • BLOG

Conflicting Estate Plans? Which will be upheld?

July 10, 2012 by Kim Barrot, Attorney

In recent local news, famous artist, Thomas Kinkade passed away. During his marriage, Kinkade executed an estate plan with his wife, however, though legally separated; Kinkade did not revoke or amend his estate plan. Instead, after engaging in a new relationship, he executed holographic instruments leaving a sizeable amount, including his home, studio and $10 million to set up a museum in Kinkade’s honor to his current girlfriend. Now after his passing, his wife and girlfriend are left to dispute who should represent his estate and who shall resceive his $60 million estate.

While this case may seem out of touch with reality as most decedents do not leave such a large estate, the fact is that even with a relatively small estate, the battle over inconsistent and conflicting estate plans is inevitable if not cleared up before death. Had Kinkade intended for his estate to go to his wife according to his original estate plan, perhaps he could have executed a Codicil to his Will leaving specific bequests to his girlfriend. Alternatively, if it wasn’t his intent to provide for his wife at his death, Kinkade should have revoked his current estate plan during his separation and not waited until his divorce was finalized. The difficulty now is that nobody truly knows his intentions. His wife, girlfriend and the court are left to decipher between his original documents and his holographic instruments, to which the validity is being questioned by handwriting analysts as being executed by an incompetent man.

Handwritten documents, while easy to execute, may or may not be held up at death. Also, handwritten notes on your original documents, does not sufficiently amend the documents. It is advised to revisit your estate plan every three years and execute formal amendments to ensure that at your death, there is no question as to your intent.

Thomas Kinkade estate fight will be in open court, judge rules

Filed Under: General

Blog Subscription

Office Address

865 Laurel Street, Suite 4
San Carlos, CA 94070
United States (US)
Phone: (650) 463-1550
Fax: (650) 463-1560

Opening hours

Monday9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Tuesday9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Wednesday9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Thursday9:00 AM - 5:00 PM

Map

fc_sidbr_map
x

YES! I would like access to over 40 Worksheets and Checklists discussed in The Ultimate Caregiver Guide!

© 2021 American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.